ASUU won a few modest concessions, but most of them were in the form of government promises. We know how these promises usually turn out. The government reneges on them, leading to another strike, and another poorly implemented “agreement.” And on and on it goes in a rinse and repeat cycle that torments and shortchanges students and their parents.
What’s more, the latest “resolution” does not break any new ground and is largely premised on the old MOU and entitlements enshrined therein. The strike essentially reaffirmed the status quo.
What this means is that ASUU has not achieved much from the strike and merely cut its losses when it realized that it had no leverage and was losing the PR battle in the public domain.
Speaking of losing support, ASUU loses a large slice of public opinion with each strike.
It shouldn’t be so because, all things considered, ASUU has been a net benefit to the Nigerian university sector.
The problem is that it is a union moored to an outdated method of struggle, rigidly unwilling to acknowledge the limitations and diminished public appeal of its actions and rhetoric.
For good or bad, most Nigerians now blame strikes as much as they blame the government inaction for the problems in Nigerian universities. They no longer see strikes as a solution but as part of the problem.
More tellingly, most Nigerians consider lecturers to be self-absorbed, tone-deaf, insensitive, and navel-gazing operatives who are incapable of seeing how they have become part of the problem and how they’ve become the primary culprits for the absence of moral and instructional accountability and the decline of academic quality control in the system.
Unless lecturers look inward, become self-critical, and begin to live up to their familiar rhetoric of trying to rescue a comatose university system, they will continue to lose public support and will eventually become irreverent objects of scorn with no moral sway and only the power to blackmail and take hostages–the hostages being students.
Where is ASUU when Nigerians discuss the problems of poor and non-existent teaching; rampant sexual harassment; poor supervision and mentorship; corruption and ethical violations; plagiarism; a flawed academic staff recruitment process; lax and politicized academic staff promotion requirements; the absence of merit pay for productive and exemplary lecturers; tyranny towards students; and pedagogical poverty?
Not only is ASUU usually missing from and uninterested in such discussions, it usually supports and provides refuge for its members accused of failing in these areas. The union is happy to be an incubator and rewarder of mediocrity and nonchalance among its members.
And yet, to many neutrals in the perennial struggle between government and ASUU, the aforementioned issues, for which lecturers are culpable and which are directly within their purview, are as responsible for the decline of University education in Nigeria as the funding and infrastructure issues often privileged in ASUU propaganda.
If you ask the question of why standards are falling, research quality and quantity declining, and graduates getting worse even as ASUU has “won” significant salary and funding increases over the last three decades, ASUU deflects by blaming the poor quality of admitted students; that is when its goons are not attacking you for daring to pose such a “sacrilegious” question. ASUU never takes responsibility.
It is no longer enough for ASUU people to deflect these issues by saying that these are policy and governance issues under the remit of government and universities management and that ASUU is a trade union that is only concerned with the pecuniary interests and institutional comforts of its members.
If that claim is true then why does ASUU preface and bookend its statements and rhetorical expressions with the claim that it is fighting to save the university system for the benefits of everyone—students, parents, and society?
ASUU cannot have it both ways. If they’re only a trade union then they should stop assaulting us with claims of caring about and trying to save our universities from ruin.
ASUU people cannot insist on being judged as a trade union with a members-focused mandate when matters of ethics, abuses, and dereliction of duties are mentioned but then turn around, when they desire support for their strike, to claim that they are fighting for all stakeholders and trying to save the university.
If they’re truly concerned about the salvation of our universities, they have to start addressing the failings of their members and commit to helping to hold failing and erring members accountable.
Only then will they win back the support of Nigerians who have become disillusioned with ASUU’s rhetorical claims and its increasingly counterproductive and fruitless industrial actions.