Elombah
Take a fresh look at your lifestyle.

Change: The aphrodisiac of search for democracy – by Reuben Abati

152

When aggrieved politicians within the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) decided to join forces with members of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) and the All Progressives Peoples Alliance (APGA) to form the All Progressives Congress (APC) in 2013 for a change, they had well-defined, if not so clearly stated, even if poorly conceived objectives: 

Send President Goodluck Jonathan out of power, displace the PDP which had clearly become a dominating hegemonic party, exert vengeance and offer the people an alternative. 

The triumph of the APC in the 2015 elections resulting in victory at the Presidential level, in 23 states out of 36, and also in the legislature, state and federal, was propelled on the wings of the people’s embrace of this slogan of change. 

Change became the aphrodisiac of Nigeria’s search for democratic progress. The new party’s promises were delivered with so much certainty and cock-suredness. 

Those who were promised free meals were already salivating before casting the first vote. 

The permanently opportunistic players in Nigeria’s private sector could be seen trading across the lines as they have always done. 

Everyone knew the PDP had too much internal baggage to deal with.  

The opposition exploited this to the fullest and they were helped in no small measure, not just by the party’s implosion, but also the offensiveness of the claims by certain elements within the PDP that their party will rule Nigeria forever. 

This arrogance had gone down the rank and file resulting in bitter conflicts among the various big men who dominated the party. 

The party failed from within, and even after losing the 2015 elections, it has further failed to recover from the effects of the factionalism that demystified it and drove it out of its hegemonic comfort zone. 

It took the PDP 16 years to get that hubristic moment. It is taking the APC a much shorter time to get to that same moment. 

The displacement of the PDP gave the impression that Nigeria’s political space, hitherto dominated by one party, and a half, out of over 30 political parties with fears of a possible authoritarian one-party system, had become competitive.  

But the victory of a new party over a dominant political party in power such as occurred in 2015, has not delivered the much-expected positives: instead, questions have been raised about the depth of democratic change and the quality of Nigeria’s political development. 

The disappointment on both scores has been telling. 

The ruling APC has not been able to live up to expectations. In less than two years in power, it has been behaving not like the PDP, but worse. 

Not a day passes without a pundit or a party member or a civil society activist suggesting that the only way forward is the formation of a new political party. 

There are over 30 registered political parties in Nigeria; no one is saying that these political parties should be reorganized and made more functional; the received opinion is that a new political party would have to replace the APC. 

The implied message is the subject of political science. Many political parties in Africa, not just in Nigeria, lack substance. 

They reflect the problematic nature of party politics in the continent, even after the third wave of the continent’s democratic experience. 

Party organizations are weak, their organs are inchoate, their fortunes are mercurial. 

In Nigeria, this seems to be more of a post-military rule reality, for in the First and Second Republics, some of Nigeria’s political parties appeared to be more relatively people-based and socially-rooted. 

The military left behind an authoritarian streak at the heart of Nigeria’s party politics, producing political parties since 1999 that do not fully reflect or assimilate the people’s yearnings. 

There isn’t therefore yet in place a mass-based, people-driven political party to replace the elite-based hegemonic parties we have, despite early efforts in the past in this direction by the likes of Aminu Kano and his People’s Redemption Party (PRP), Fela Anikulapo-Kuti’s Movement of the People (MOP), Tunji Braithwaite’s Nigeria Advance Party (NAP), Gani Fawehinmi’s National Conscience Party (NCP) and Wole Soyinka’s Democratic Front for the People’s Federation. 

There was also the Labour Party, mentioned separately here, advisedly, because it ended up abandoning its social democratic base, and became like the regular parties, an elite cabal, with the initial progressives who championed it on the platform of the Nigeria Labour Congress, moving ideologically to the right in an attempt to align with the Nigerian mainstream and its ready benefits. 

A profile of this political party and its initial principal promoters would reveal just how alimentary Nigerian politics is. 

Our immediate concern, however, is to argue that those who are raising the flag of a new political party as the answer to the emerging failure of the APC and the growth of factions among its members, and by extension, the spreading despair in the land, are missing the point. 

They are not promising any revolutionary change nor are they interested in deepening Nigeria’s democratic change. 

Permit me to quote Danjuma Gambo, of the Enugu Chapter of the Civil Liberties Organization (CLO) who reportedly said: 

Continues…

Comments are closed.