The Pro Abortionist’s Arguments
That a foetus is not human yet and can be terminated so the child does not get exposed to poverty when it is born and the parents are poor
A human life cycle has different stages from foetus to childbirth to infancy to teenage-age to young adult to adult to mid-age and to old age. Therefore, who has the right to decide when it is normal to cut short this life cycle in the name of avoiding poverty? Ok, say we decide to kill an infant…ok, let me extend it a little bit,…say we decide to terminate my teenage child or two-year-old because I am poor or because I will be poor forever, how does this make anything right using the pro-abortion argument of “POVERTY” as a yardstick?