Elombah
Take a fresh look at your lifestyle.

The Pro Abortionist’s Arguments

That a foetus is not human yet and can be terminated so the child does not get exposed to poverty when it is born and the parents are poor

113
The Pro Abortionist’s Arguments.
 
That a foetus is not human yet and can be terminated so the child does not get exposed to poverty when it is born and the parents are poor
 
To say that a foetus is not human yet and as such, could be aborted is one of the most disgusting misapprehensions or misapplication of biological logic I have come across since I could read any ism-works of literature.
 
A human life cycle has different stages from foetus to childbirth to infancy to teenage-age to young adult to adult to mid-age and to old age. Therefore, who has the right to decide when it is normal to cut short this life cycle in the name of avoiding poverty? Ok, say we decide to kill an infant…ok, let me extend it a little bit,…say we decide to terminate my teenage child or two-year-old because I am poor or because I will be poor forever, how does this make anything right using the pro-abortion argument of “POVERTY” as a yardstick?
 
I mean, poverty is not cast in stone. All works of literature written on economics can buttress this point. But an aborted child has been irredeemably jettisoned. The situation of poverty and or wealth is like a swinging pendulum and the to and fro that comes with it makes a mockery of me killing my child because I am poor. Ok, say I am rich now with children, do I now kill them when the shit hits the fan and I lose all my money? So now having enough money is the new and only normal?
 
I mean, they would pretend like a foetus is not human and I will tell them that based on their logic, even a young infant is also not human yet. This is true because an infant… or say,… a three-year-old child is on another stage of the human life cycle. So who decides the stage of the cycle that can be jettisoned for our selfishness.
 
I mean, why do we allow power-hungry social constructionists to determine for us what part of the life cycle is useless enough to be quenched at will?
 
I have tried to, but I have realized that I could never get along with the ideology of the LEFTISTS. I mean, we can only do so if we decide to switch off our ability to critically analyze these things.

Comments are closed.